World news and comment from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk |
- Turkey's huge interest rate hike calms markets - business live
- Hong Kong lesbian to wealthy dad: stop trying to buy me a husband
- Cameron and Miliband at PMQs: Politics live blog
- UK agrees to take up to 500 of the most traumatised Syrian refugees
- Time to leave Google Maps and head back to the A-Z? | Steven Poole
- Nicaragua backs unlimited presidential terms
- Thai police to deploy 10,000 officers in Bangkok for election
- Fairfax to pay Kim Williams $95,000 plus legal costs after inaccurate article
- Jobs at risk if Australia scraps renewable target, says solar lobby
- Philippine offensive against Islamists kills 37, military says
- Commission hears evidence on sexual abuse by Salvation Army officer
- Star Wars desert set – in pictures
- Cities debate: teenagers talk London, New York, Johannesburg and Rio
- PNG leader apologises to Bougainville for sparking bloody 1990s civil war
- Properties for less than $100,000
- China jails another New Citizens activist
- Wake-up call for drivers as scientists work on roadside test for tiredness
- Prison system is almost full, and overflowing in some states, report says
- Spotify: how a busy songwriter you've never heard of makes it work for him
- Is Britain ripe for Gandhi's message?: from the archive, 29 January 1968
- Inside the Animal Mind – TV review
- Interactive: How many sports players end up as professional athletes?
- Craig Thomson trial: use of credit card for escorts was not fraud, defence says
- Henning Mankell, Wallander author, reveals he has cancer
- Woman who was trapped under bus in Sydney's CBD taken to hospital
Turkey's huge interest rate hike calms markets - business live Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:28 AM PST |
Hong Kong lesbian to wealthy dad: stop trying to buy me a husband Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:24 AM PST |
Cameron and Miliband at PMQs: Politics live blog Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:19 AM PST |
UK agrees to take up to 500 of the most traumatised Syrian refugees Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:08 AM PST Britain will not participate in 'quota' programme after government reaches compromise with UNHCR following weeks of resistance The government has struck a deal with the United Nations that will allow Britain to take in hundreds of the most vulnerable Syrian refugees without having to host a UN-imposed quota. The compromise ends weeks of resistance by the government to becoming involved in the UN refugee programme and comes before a Labour-tabled debate in the Commons on Wednesday designed to put pressure on the government to do more to take refugees from the battle-torn country. In an agreement with the UN high commissioner for refugees (UNHCR), the government has decided to provide refuge for some of those most traumatised by the crisis, such as vulnerable women and children. Coalition sources said no more than about 500 refugees would be permitted entry, including family members, but their precise citizenship status, determining the right of other family members to come to the UK, had yet to be agreed. The Home Office has persistently resisted taking UN-supplied refugees, arguing that the British government is fulfilling its duties by leading the effort to supply aid to refugees in camps on the Syrian borders with Jordan and Turkey. The home secretary, Theresa May, has been concerned that British involvement in the UN refugee programme would become an open-ended commitment that risked undermining the Tories' commitment to reducing net migration to the UK to tens of thousands by 2015. David Cameron moved subtly to change that target this week, telling the BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Monday that his government would get net migration down to "responsible levels" by the end of the parliament. Cameron, representing in public the dominant view in the Home Office, has argued that it would let other countries off the hook over their failure to provide aid if the UK agreed to take a large number of refugees. The UK has already committed £600m in humanitarian aid. The deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, said: "I am pleased to be able to announce that the UK will be providing refuge to some of the most vulnerable Syrian refugees. The coalition government wants to play our part in helping to alleviate the immense suffering in Syria. "The £600m we have provided makes us the second largest bilateral donor of humanitarian aid in the world. But as the conflict continues to force millions of Syrians from their homes, we need to make sure we are doing everything we can. "We are one of the most open-hearted countries in the world and I believe we have a moral responsibility to help. "The UNHCR – which backs our new resettlement programme – has said the highest priority should go to women and girls who have experienced or are at risk of sexual violence; the elderly; and survivors of torture and individuals with disabilities, so that's who we'll target. Sadly, we cannot provide safety for everyone who needs it, but we can reach out to some of those who need it most. "On top of that, we'll continue to support the peace talks currently taking place in Geneva, because only a political resolution between the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition will provide a permanent end to the suffering. "Britain has a long and proud tradition of provided refuge at times of crisis. This coalition government will ensure it lives on." The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said on Tuesday that MPs from all parties backed UK financial support to Syria, but she argued it was wrong to say the government could not send aid and also resettle refugees. A minority of refugees were "too vulnerable to come" to the UK to seek asylum, "or to survive, even, in the camps", she said. "That is why it's so important to provide that extra help – this is not an either/or." She in effect believes the coalition deal struck by Clegg is accepting the UN scheme without formally participating in it. Roland Schilling, the UK representative of the UNHCR, said: "We welcome the announcement of the UK government to provide refuge to some of the most vulnerable Syrian refugees, in co-operation with UNHCR. "This decision will help to provide much needed solutions for vulnerable Syrian refugees, many of whom have been deeply traumatised and face immense hardship. "It is also a concrete and important gesture of solidarity and burden sharing with the countries neighbouring Syria as they continue to bear the brunt of the refugee crisis. "Today's decision is an encouraging and important step, reaffirming the UK's commitment and contribution to international relief efforts in support of more than 2.3 million Syrian refugees and the countries hosting them. "UNHCR also recognises the UK's generous contribution towards massive humanitarian needs in the region. "While awaiting the details of the government's plan, UNHCR looks forward to working closely with the Home Office on the implementation of the UK resettlement programme." Maurice Wren, the Refugee Council chief executive, said: "This news, quite simply, will transform people's lives. It also sends an important message to the rest of the world: Britain has a proud tradition of protecting and welcoming refugees and we will continue to lead the way in offering refuge to people in their greatest hour of need. "We commend the government for upholding this reputation by going the extra mile and offering protection to some of the most vulnerable refugees who will now have chance to rebuild their lives in safety. We hope other countries now follow the UK's lead by providing resettlement places to those who so desperately need it." theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Time to leave Google Maps and head back to the A-Z? | Steven Poole Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:07 AM PST For people with no sense of direction, Google Maps is godsend – as long as you're relaxed about giving your data to digital marketers and GCHQ I was born missing the bit of the brain that apparently furnishes other people with a magical thing called a "sense of direction". (My two sisters are the same way, so it seems to be a tragic genetic malformation.) I have got lost in ridiculously simple places. I could probably get lost in a lift. The advent of Google Maps on smartphones, therefore, instantly became for me one of the wonders of the modern world. I depend on it everywhere. If I have no data signal, I revert to a blundering wreck, moving around in random directions and bumping into things like a fleshy dodgem. So the news that GCHQ and NSA can suck up the location data from people using Google Maps on a smartphone puts me in a quandary. If I don't want the government to know where I am at all times, then I won't ever know where I am myself. In an internal document from 2008, British spooks enthused: "[I]t effectively means that anyone using Google Maps on a smartphone is working in support of a GCHQ system." The ascription here of helpful labour ("working in support of") to the smartphone-toting citizenry is an interesting nuance: it pictures the vast majority of people being snooped-on – not as suspicious targets in themselves but as unwitting contributors to a grand social project. We don't (or didn't) know it, but we are helping to build the total surveillance state, the perfect wireless panopticon. Perhaps this is what the Conservatives really meant when they claimed that "we're all in it together". (Even so, I must confess to feeling a glow of patriotic pride on learning that GCHQ's codename for this system was Tracker Smurf. Other countries' spies would never allow themselves such heartwarming frivolity.) More familiar is the argument that in using Google Maps, as well as all kinds of other cloud-based products and social media such as Facebook, we are "working in support" not of official security agencies but of giant corporations. In return for these apparently "free" services, we obediently conduct our own self-surveillance and voluntarily upload the data to the companies who profit from it. Some people argue, indeed, that we should be more worried about providing our data to commercial companies, and less worried about whatever the state snatches on the way. At least, so this argument runs, governments are democratically accountable. (In the thin sense that every four or five years we can vote in a different lot with a slightly varied roster of corporate interests.) And while official agencies will use smartphone data to harass people they suspect of crimes, the tech corporations use it to harass everyone: to show us more adverts and sell our aggregated details to other marketing companies that will spam us incessantly till we die. Companies are eagerly working on improving the precision of location-tracking even inside shops, so your phone can tell which aisle you are walking down and blast a commercial in your face at exactly the right moment. (Apple is already doing this in some of its retail stores.) Compared with this soon to be accomplished dystopia of omnipresent ambient advertising, then, the drawbacks of state location surveillance might seem small to the average individual. Certainly, if GCHQ has studied my collection of "starred" places in London that I have saved to Google Maps, it will know that I seem to be mostly fond of decent pubs, which is to say that I am a perfectly ordinary Englishman. But the point to civil libertarians, of course, is that the reassuring motto "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" constitutes blanket authorisation for any degree of totalitarian intrusion. What, then, are the options for the Google Maps user who prefers not to send the equivalent of a text cheerily saying "I'm here!" to the government every time he or she moves from one pub to another? Apple's Maps has apparently improved since its first version directed unsuspecting Australian motorists into the middle of a national-park wilderness, but it would be naive to imagine that GCHQ and NSA don't have access, or won't soon, to this app's data too, as well as other digital options. So maybe these latest revelations will spark a resurgence of actual maps – you know, the ones printed on paper. Perhaps it's time to invest in an A-Z. No, not the smartphone version. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Nicaragua backs unlimited presidential terms Posted: 29 Jan 2014 01:04 AM PST Critics say constitutional changes approved by national assembly could keep leader Daniel Ortega in power for life Nicaraguan lawmakers have approved constitutional changes that would allow President Daniel Ortega to be re-elected indefinitely, a move that his critics say is designed to keep the Sandinista leader in power for life. The largely Sandinista national assembly voted for the amendments for a second time on Tuesday as required for them to become law. The changes eliminate presidential term limits and lower the bar for election by naming the candidate with the most votes as the winner. Until now, a candidate needed to garner at least 35% of the votes to win. Sixty-three of the 92 deputies in the assembly belong to Ortega's party and the vote was 64-25 in favour of the changes. Ortega is serving his third term under a supreme court decision that overrode the constitutional ban. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Thai police to deploy 10,000 officers in Bangkok for election Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:41 AM PST Minister urges voters to turn out for 2 February election that protesters vow to disrupt in bid to topple Yingluck Shinawatra Thailand's government will deploy 10,000 police in the capital for Sunday's election, which protesters have promised to disrupt as part of their attempt to topple the prime minister, Yingluck Shinawatra. The government decided on Tuesday to press ahead with the 2 February election, which the main opposition party plans to boycott and despite warnings that it could lead to more violence without resolving the country's increasingly bitter political divide. "I ask Bangkok residents to come out and vote," the labour minister Chalerm Yoobamrung told reporters on Wednesday. "The police will take care of security … Those who are thinking of going and shutting polling stations in the morning should think twice because the police will not allow them to." Protesters prevented early voting at many polling stations in Bangkok last Sunday. They took to the streets in November in the latest eruption of a political conflict that has gripped Thailand for eight years. It broadly pits Bangkok's middle class and royalist establishment against the mainly poor, rural supporters of Yingluck and her brother, ousted former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, who lives in self-imposed exile. The protesters accuse Yingluck of being a puppet of Thaksin, a man they say is a corrupt crony capitalist who used taxpayers' money to buy elections with costly populist giveaways. Chalerm, who is in charge of a state of emergency imposed last week, told reporters about 10,000 police would be dispatched on Sunday to take care of security at the capital's polling stations. Even though Yingluck's ruling party is certain to win, not enough candidates have been able to register to provide a quorum in the new parliament after the election. Byelections will have to be held later to fill the vacant seats, which means the prospect of a caretaker, and fairly powerless, government under Yingluck for several more months. The protests are taking their toll on the economy, with major foreign investors beginning to question the merits of ploughing any more money into their Thai operations. Protesters took to the streets of Bangkok again on Wednesday but in a relatively small rally of about 500 people. They were without their firebrand leader, Suthep Thaugsuban, who was apparently deterred by the previous day's violence in which a protester was shot and wounded. In a sign of how the legal establishment has largely lined up against Yingluck's government, a criminal court on Tuesday rejected a government application for an arrest warrant against Suthep, saying there was not enough evidence to grant it. Suthep is already wanted for insurrection and on charges of murder related to violence in 2010 when, as deputy prime minister, he sent in troops to crush protests by redshirt supporters of Thaksin. The death toll then was more than 90. Thaksin, with his huge wealth and support, is deemed a threat to the Bangkok-based establishment, dominated by the military and the bureaucracy, and Suthep and his followers want to eradicate the influence of the former telecoms tycoon and his family by altering electoral arrangements. The election commission, also widely seen as favouring the establishment-aligned opposition, had been arguing for a delay in the vote of up to four months, saying the country was too unstable to hold an election. There are widespread fears that violence could escalate. So far, the military has stayed firmly on the sidelines, in contrast to the past: it has staged or attempted 18 coups in 80 years of on-off democracy. Analysts say the army is nervous that this time intervention would trigger even more violence with Thaksin's redshirt supporters threatening to descend on the capital if Yingluck is overthrown. Yingluck is Thailand's fifth prime minister since the populist Thaksin was toppled by the army in 2006 and went into exile two years later to escape a jail sentence that was handed down for abuse of power. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Fairfax to pay Kim Williams $95,000 plus legal costs after inaccurate article Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:19 AM PST |
Jobs at risk if Australia scraps renewable target, says solar lobby Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:15 AM PST |
Philippine offensive against Islamists kills 37, military says Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:14 AM PST Assault follows attacks by rebels who reject Malaysian-brokered peace deal between insurgents and Manila government At least 37 Islamist fighters have been killed in the Philippines in a two-day offensive against insurgents opposed to a new peace deal between the government and the main Muslim rebel group, according to the military. President Benigno Aquino III said the military had launched the assault to protect villages after Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement fighters staged attacks in southern Maguindanao province. Troops were aiming "to seriously degrade their abilities to again act as spoilers", Aquino told reporters. The rebels involved in the fighting have opposed peace talks between the government and the larger Moro Islamic Liberation Front, which were concluded over the weekend in Malaysia. They said because the Malaysian-brokered talks would not lead to a separate homeland for minority Muslims in the south they would continue their armed uprising. The regional military spokesman, Colonel Dickson Hermoso, said 12 of the rebels killed had been identified, with the help of village leaders; others had been buried in graves discovered by troops in and near a village in Maguindanao. One soldier died and four others had been wounded by rebel bombs hidden around a mosque late on Tuesday, Hermoso said. A rebel spokesman, Abu Misry, disputed the military report, saying there had been no deaths and only seven insurgents had been wounded in army shelling and helicopter rocket fire. Hundreds of villagers fled the fighting, illustrating the difficulty of ending violence in the country's south. Aside from the main Moro rebel group, which concluded negotiations on Saturday with the government for a new Muslim autonomy deal in the south, at least four other smaller insurgent groups threaten the peace in the region. Those groups include the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement and the smaller but more violent Abu Sayyaf, which is notorious for bombings, kidnappings and beheadings. Aquino said the new peace deal would bring the government and the 11,000-strong main Moro rebel group together to pursue outlaws. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Commission hears evidence on sexual abuse by Salvation Army officer Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:02 AM PST |
Star Wars desert set – in pictures Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:01 AM PST |
Cities debate: teenagers talk London, New York, Johannesburg and Rio Posted: 29 Jan 2014 12:00 AM PST 'Children are a kind of indicator species. If we can build a successful city for children, we will have a successful city for all people,' says Enrique Peñalosa, former mayor of Bogotá, credited with transforming his city. The Guardian talks to young people around the world about how they rate their home cities THE GUARDIAN CITIES PANELJOHANNESBURG LONDON NEW YORK RIO DE JANEIRO Our home citiesMichel (Rio) Yara (London) Monky (Jo'burg) Kafila (NY) RaÃssa (Rio) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Yara (London) Aida (London) CommunityAmosh (NY) Michel (Rio) RaÃssa (Rio) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Makayla (NY) Amosh (NY) SecurityKafila (NY) Yara (London) RaÃssa (Rio) Yara (London) Makayla (NY) Aida (London) Yara (London) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Michel (Rio) Amosh (NY) TechnologyLebohang (Jo'burg) Yara (London) Jack (London) Amosh (NY) RaÃssa (Rio) Michel (Rio) Yara (London) TransportRaÃssa (Rio) Monky (Jo'burg) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Amosh (NY) Kafila (NY) Aida (London) Yara (London) LeisureJack (London) Michel (Rio) Amosh (NY) Makayla (NY) Aida (London) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Yara (London) RaÃssa (Rio) Monky (Jo'burg) There are no libraries nearby and no centres for career guidance and support for those kids who have dropped out of the education system. The kids who stay in the street don't have guidance – but they need it the most. Even though they quit school, it doesn't mean they don't need support or education. What's missing?Monky (Jo'burg) RaÃssa (Rio) Michel (Rio) Lebohang (Jo'burg) Aida (London) Yara (London) The environmentMakayla (NY) Michel (Rio) RaÃssa (Rio) Amosh (NY) Jack (London) Kafila (NY) Makayla (NY) Yara (London) Aida (London) Kafila (NY) Amosh (NY) Makayla (NY) theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
PNG leader apologises to Bougainville for sparking bloody 1990s civil war Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:57 PM PST |
Properties for less than $100,000 Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:35 PM PST |
China jails another New Citizens activist Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:26 PM PST |
Wake-up call for drivers as scientists work on roadside test for tiredness Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:24 PM PST |
Prison system is almost full, and overflowing in some states, report says Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:07 PM PST |
Spotify: how a busy songwriter you've never heard of makes it work for him Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:06 PM PST |
Is Britain ripe for Gandhi's message?: from the archive, 29 January 1968 Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:00 PM PST Could Britain really be ready for Gandhi's philosophy of the simple life - asceticism, absolute social equality, service to others and non-violence? An Indian visitor who came to see me the other day announced that he thought Britain might be ready for the message of Gandhi. Very rudely, I'm afraid, I could not disguise my utter incredulity. Britain ready for Gandhi? Britain, putting a higher proportion of what it produces into personal consumption than any other country in Europe? Britain, where two out of three people, if you believe your opinion polls, put foreign aid at the top of the list of things to be cut. Gandhi, you will remember, believed in the simple life, in asceticism, in absolute social equality, in service to others, in non-violence. For Britain? You see what I mean? My visitor was Satish Kumar. His business was the Gandhi centenary year which marks the hundredth anniversary of Gandhi's birth on October 2, 1869. He is spending a couple of months in Britain, and at present is out on a tour of a dozen cities in England and Scotland. His theme: to determine the relevance of Gandhi in the Western world. His purpose: to set up local communities and seminar study groups in the main centres of Britain. This is how it is proposed to celebrate the Gandhi centenary - not with a single day's junketing but with a programme of work spanning the year. The main effort will be in India, where a national committee for the centenary year has been at work since 1965, but it will be a worldwide programme too. His case is that the Gandhi philosophy offers a way of decentralising our industrial society. It would be some Westernised form of the "Gramdan" programme in India where landowners have been persuaded to hand over their land to the peasants and village industries have been established. What it has achieved in India is impressive: 40,000 villages brought into the programme in the past three years. It has sometimes run into trouble simply because the authorities object to the degree of self-government and local decision-taking in the Gramdan communities. How would this sort of thing fit into the Western way of doing things? One thing makes the Gandhi philosophy still relevant. It may be high-minded but it is not starry-eyed. His followers believe, as Gandhi did, in practical programmes, in action rather than theorising, in a centenary year of deeds rather than speeches. The largest section of the Indian programme comes under amenities for human living. Its object is to make every village in India self-sufficient in food and clean drinking water by 1969-70. That is basic enough, but would be an immense achievement. It is unlikely that India can manage to do it alone. Let a village or a town here adopt an Indian village and set about finding the wherewithal for the plumbing. If many people in a small way would tackle a down-to-earth programme, that would be in the true Gandhi spirit. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Inside the Animal Mind – TV review Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:00 PM PST Chris Packham, Sir David Attenborough's heir apparent, puts the cool in cagoule in this fascinating blend of science and spectacle I knew dogs were good with their noses. I didn't know they were that good. Fern here – a cutely life-jacketed sprocker (half springer, half cocker) spaniel hanging eagerly over the front of a rubber dinghy – can sniff out a tin of pork under 7m of water and a further metre of silt at the bottom of lake on a howling windy wet day in Northern Ireland. As Chris Packham says, it kind of makes a mockery of those fugitives running down creeks to escape baying bloodhounds in the movies. Movie fugitives, don't bother; you might as well keep your boots dry. He – Chris Packham – is trying to do something he's always wanted to: get Inside the Animal Mind (BBC2). Via their senses, in this one (the first of three). It's not just about Fern's amazing nose, then: it's about what animals use their noses, and their other senses, to do. So wolves and dogs are equally good at sniffing out a cheese treat hidden under a cup. But they prioritise their senses differently. If the dog's owner points at the cup without any cheese underneath, the dog will still go to that one, even though there are no nice cheesy smells coming from it. Dogs put visual stimulus first; they have been domesticated, turned into obedient idiots by us. Not so the wolf, which follows its nose, literally. Wolves also like Chanel No 5, interestingly. Aaaaeeerrorooo. There's very little wolf left in Chris's own dogs, a pair of poodles called Itchy and Scratchy. And in their case, very little going on Inside the Animal Mind at all I'd say, judging by the vacant looks on their faces. You could probably point to a cliff-edge and they would obediently bound over. Maybe Jazz, a handsome brown Hungarian Vizsla, has more grey matter? He seems to know when his owner, Johnny, is coming home. Twenty minutes or so before the happy event is due to occur, Jazz starts pacing up and down excitedly, standing on the sofa, looking out of the window. (Is that a hint of down-there excitement too, Jazz – a cheeky little Hungarian semi-on?) It's something many dog owners claim – not that their dogs become aroused, but that they know when something is about to happen. A kind of doggy sixth sense, perhaps? (Possibly they see dead people too.) Or could Jazz possibly have some kind of understanding of the concept of time? And know that this is the time Johnny usually comes home. Maybe he even glances up at the kitchen clock occasionally. One day Johnny's wife, Christine, brings some of Johnny's smelly sports clothes home before her husband's return and wafts them around the house. And that changes everything – Jazz no longer gets excited at Johnny-come-home time. In fact, Johnny's arrival comes as a complete surprise to Jazz; Jazz thinks he's already there. So what's happening most days, then, for Jazz to know when Johnny is due? Well, as Packham says, it's not scientific proof, but one plausible explanation is that Jazz is using the fading smell of Johnny, who normally gets back when his own aroma gets down to a certain level, to mark the passage of time. A smell clock. The show isn't just about dogs. A dolphin called Wade knows what you're doing, even when he's blindfolded. Wade can hear what you're doing. Never play blind man's buff with a dolphin, I think that's the lesson to take from that one. I wouldn't want to, anyway – never liked dolphins, creepy clicky sex-pests. And now we know they can hear-see you in the dark [shudders]. A bunch of unnamed sharks can't get at a nice fish-supper because of a ring of magnets. (Australian swimmers, take note: wear magnets at all times – not so many that you sink, mind.) And a bird-brained bird flies down a corridor bombarded by sensory stimuli, filtering out what is unnecessary so as not to overclutter its tiny bird brain. The bird-man is called Martin. The bird – not a martin but a starling – is called Arnie. "I'll be back," cheeps Arnie each time he flies from Martin's hand. It's fascinating, all of it – just the right blend of science and spectacle. And Packham is an excellent guide, serious without being boring or schoolteacherly. A rare sight on these shores – a wildlife person with a bit of an edge – he puts the cool in cagoule … no, let's maybe not get carried away. But the heir apparent to Sir David A's crown? Go on then, though maybe lose Itchy and Scratchy. Arise, Chris. theguardian.com © 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds |
Interactive: How many sports players end up as professional athletes? Posted: 28 Jan 2014 11:00 PM PST |
Craig Thomson trial: use of credit card for escorts was not fraud, defence says Posted: 28 Jan 2014 10:49 PM PST |
Henning Mankell, Wallander author, reveals he has cancer Posted: 28 Jan 2014 10:45 PM PST |
Woman who was trapped under bus in Sydney's CBD taken to hospital Posted: 28 Jan 2014 10:32 PM PST |
You are subscribed to email updates from World news and comment from the Guardian | theguardian.com To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Posting Komentar